21 Sep 2025
When the University of Worcester released its study this month praising the “significant educational transformation” of Steiner Waldorf schools, it marked the end of a long and challenging chapter. Six years ago, Ofsted’s former Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman questioned whether Steiner (also known as Waldorf) education was even compatible with modern standards after a spate of failed inspections. Today, inspectors are commending schools for their “creative, rich and inclusive curricula” and “high-quality teaching”. This turnaround is a major achievement and there is more to do, - not every school is there yet - but the deeper story is what Waldorf education can offer at a time when big questions are being asked about the future direction of education.
The upcoming national curriculum review, led by Becky Francis and due in the autumn, is expected to address issues of curriculum breadth, creativity and wellbeing. Waldorf education - founded over a century ago on principles of nurturing curiosity, imagination and holistic learning - has much to contribute to that debate. It offers a living model of how education can be different yet still meet regulatory expectations and high standards.
There is growing recognition that the skills children and young people need for the 21st century are not simply the ability to memorise knowledge and pass exams, but to think creatively, approach problems imaginatively and collaborate effectively. Waldorf education has championed this ethos for over 100 years.
Its cross-curricular approach cultivates flexible, imaginative thinking and problem-solving which is precisely what’s needed in a world shaped by rapid technological change and AI. Artistic activities are woven into the school day, so that art, music and movement become part of academic teaching and learning. This ‘head, heart and hands’ approach not only supports memory and understanding, but ensures pupils are genuinely immersed in their work.
Education faces a growing crisis in children and young people’s mental health, with stress, anxiety and absenteeism all on the rise. Evidence increasingly indicates that the narrow, test-driven focus of the current national curriculum exacerbates these pressures and may contribute to the rising demand for SEND support.
Waldorf schools, by contrast, follow a broader, human-centred philosophy. What is learned, and how it is learned, is matched to emotional maturity as well as intellectual ability. For example, in early childhood, Waldorf kindergartens focus on physical, social and language development through play, practical and craft activities, songs and stories. Aligned with both research and practice in educationally successful countries such as those in Scandinavia, formal teaching in reading does not begin until age six - when children tend to learn effortlessly and enthusiastically.
Across the age range, hands-on, real-world learning - indoors and out - helps every child and young person to find purpose and develop the sense of competence that underpins confidence and self-worth.
The Worcester report highlights how Waldorf schools have improved academic standards and met Ofsted requirements without compromising this ethos, offering a model for integrating the arts into learning in a cost-effective way. Waldorf teacher training, now in partnership with UK universities, equips teachers with these artistic and pedagogical skills.
As debates rage over smartphone bans and the impact of screen time for young children, Waldorf education has long offered a measured approach to technology. The introduction of digital devices is delayed until children have built solid foundations in social learning and critical thinking, enabling them to enter the online world with emotional maturity and discernment. A recently published Waldorf research project, HERMMES, offers a balanced model. Evidence increasingly supports this approach, suggesting that delaying screen use in early childhood can enhance attention, creativity and emotional regulation.
The Francis review’s interim report makes clear that its final recommendations will understandably be limited to evolution, not revolution. Yet calls are growing for the narrow academic focus of the last 15 years to be challenged. Should schools continue to prioritise knowledge alone? Or should they also aim to develop well-rounded, resilient and creative individuals, learning in diverse and meaningful ways? Waldorf education demonstrates that these goals are not mutually exclusive; both are needed.
The Worcester report notes how Waldorf schools have rebuilt confidence not just by addressing past shortcomings, but by showing that an education rooted in creativity can meet Ofsted and other regulatory expectations - and that children can flourish in such schools.
The UK’s national education debate often feels binary: exam results versus creativity, vocational versus academic. Waldorf schools’ success in navigating these tensions should give us pause. As we face the dual challenges of a mental health crisis among young people and a world transformed by AI, the question is no longer whether we can afford to take creativity in education seriously - it’s whether we can afford not to. Fran.russell@waldorfeducation.uk